Saturday, December 8, 2012

Will the Hobbit Break Box Office Records?!

Fans of everything Tolkein have no trouble understanding why people might want to pay good money to see a film about a vertically challenged creature of the imagination, whose every aspiration is simply predisposed toward goodness and honour. But let’s look outward for a moment to consider the nervy moguls that control great chunks of planet Earth’s finances, some of whom finance projects like The Hobbit trilogy. They get genuinely worried whenever a new film comes along just in case, against expectations it bombs; “Battleship” and Edgar Rice Burroughs’ inspired adventure, “John Carter” spring to mind in 2012.
According to Reuters Hollywood is living in great expectations of Hobbit success, so much so that they are counting on the film marking a record upturn in cinematic fortunes.
So, what’s the problem? Surely, box office receipts have done nothing but increase year upon year since 2000? Well, yes they have, but for all the wrong reasons, it appears. The Hobbit could signal a turning point, at least in North America that is, where receipts from cinema-goers are now expected to rise for all the right reasons. They say:
“The film, which opens on December 14, is expected to contribute to the first annual box office increase in North America in three years, a sign that big movie studios have made more films enticing enough to get people into theaters and away from their TVs, games and the Internet.”
That’s remarkable when you consider some of the big-hitters that have gone before. It seems though, that any previous increase in receipts had been more due to small hikes in ticket prices year on year than avid fans demanding to see a great movie.
That’s not to rubbish the others, mind you. There are always good pictures being produced, just not in the volumes needed to make financiers feel secure about the future of the big budget movie experience. “Skyfall,” the highest grossing of the 23 James Bond films to date is still pulling in massive profits at over $227 million in domestic sales so far. The Hobbit is expected to do even better. Speaking about recent output quality, Chris Aronson, president of domestic distribution at News Corp’s 20th Century Fox studio said,
“There is something for everyone. When we achieve that as an industry and the movies are of good quality, that’s when good things happen.”
So, to summarise: the general quality of movies has risen so far recently, that even more people have been driven into the cinema to watch them. What’s more, the exploits of a seemingly insignificant inhabitant of Middle-Earth are set, once again, to change the status quo forever. Nothing new in that then!

A Critical Review of The Hobbit?


With little more than a week to go before ‘The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey’ goes on general release the critics’ opinions are hitting the streets worldwide. From tabloid newspaper, to respected literary journal, everyone wants to say something following the recent preview. Now that they are firing off in all directions, we thought it time to pull together the most important points so that the fans can take stock.
You are a fan, right? Thought so, this brings up the first issue. Some critics have found the film overly long. And this is a criticism? OK, the end of the Rings Trilogy did, for me at least, contain one meaningful glance too many that could, maybe, have been cut, but it was not overly long on content.Variety has the film down as having a,
“mythologically dense, CG-heavy prologue”.
For which read: a very complicated opening section that uses a lot of modern cinematic techniques. On the other hand, The Hollywood Reporter says,
“Jackson and his colleagues have created a purist’s delight”,
For which read, equally of the same section: a film written by a fan for fans, from a fan’s perspective.
Initially, I’d be tempted to think, were I not someone versed in the back stories of the Hobbit myth that the film is shaping up into an overblown flop. Well…possibly from a purist film buff’s perspective they want to imply that there are flaws in the cinematography and storytelling style, I don’t know. I have this theory though, that anyone who is prepared to sit through thousands of pages of literature with the specific intent of getting immersed in a fantasy world of labyrinthine proportions, isn’t going to be too bothered that a film is very long and contains great levels of detail; just the opposite.
That said I get the point. It is always difficult to translate books into film in such a way that you do not lose the essence of the read, (or possibly in this case, get so much of it).
What else? Entertainmentwise raises the 48 FPS issue, once more, saying the:
“…format is making cinema goers dizzy.”
This may actually prove a problem in the end. There’s certainly been much comment about it, some of it reported on this site, but none of us will know one way or the other until we meet someone, retching as they fall through the cinema doors! This one does remind me a bit when they released ‘The Excorcist’ in 1973, as we got reports then, most of it over-hyped, of people fainting in the aisles through fright and having to undergo psychological trauma therapy.
Elsewhere, IMDB already rates the film at 9.1 stars on the basis of 7,599 users’ votes. The Spectator says,
“Don’t watch the Hobbit”,
But only because the book’s too good to spoil! Seems like a fair point, but I think we all agree about how good the book is already. As far as I can see, the critics are probably stumped generally by the intricacy of Jackson’s vision. Richard Corliss makes the point in Time Entertainment, incidentally while also giving us an interesting graphic of how Gollum is filmed, (take a look), that:
 “Jackson has brought the same capacious vision and maniacal attention to detail [that he did to The Rings Trilogy]”
Hmm…after all that, I was rather expecting to be able to say to everyone reading this, please do / do not bother seeing the film, since the critics have summed it up perfectly as being brilliant / rubbish. Looks like we’ll all have to go and see for ourselves, so that we can make our own minds up. Whatever next?

Gandalf Defends Hobbit Trilogy Decision


Straight from the mouth of Gandalf himself, as it were. Sir Ian McKellen, who plays the mysterious wizard in both the LOTR trilogy and Hobbit films has moved to squash any suggestion that the new films are simply a money-making exercise. Reported in The Hollywood Reporter the venerated actor reiterated a view expressed by thousands of visitors to this site since the story first broke:
“Anyone who thinks Peter Jackson would fall for market forces around him rather than artistic integrity doesn’t know the guy or the body of his work. If we just made one movie, The Hobbit, the fact is that all the fans, the eight-, nine- and 10-year-old boys, they would watch it 1,000 times. Now, they’ve got three films they can watch 1,000 times.”
With his usual eye for detail and genius for spotting precisely the story people want to be told, Jackson has used the extra hours to fill in stories about minor characters, hint at dark background themes and generally give us a better insight into JRR Tolkien’s riotous imagination. Also, McKellen states:
“The (Hobbit) is written in a very brisk pace, so pretty major events in the story are covered in only two or three pages… (We) wanted to do a little bit more character development, plus… we could also adapt the appendices of Return of the King, which is 100-odd pages of material that sort of takes place around the time of The Hobbit, so we wanted to expand the story of The Hobbit a little bit more, as did Tolkien himself. So all those factors combined gave us the material to do it.”
How many times do we hear the complaint, ‘I read the book, but they missed so much in the film they didn’t do it justice’? When a director goes in the other direction, i.e. picks up on all the little clues of a short story and expands on them, then he’s criticized for doing the opposite.
Jackson, of course, knows the consequences of all this. He is already on record with MTV as doubting his films will get the acting plaudits due to them:
“I think we’ve got great possibilities in the below-the-line categories. Above the line, I don’t think so much.  I wish it was a year where we could celebrate Ian McKellen as supporting actor, or Martin Freeman – or Andy Serkis, for that matter – as a supporting actor. The acting awards seem to elude us, at least for these types of films. I don’t know why.”
Peter Jackson has a clear idea as to who should play whom in his films. He wanted Martin Freeman so badly that apparently he rescheduled shooting just to get him. Speaking to MTV Martin said:
“I got a call to say Peter had rearranged his shoot so I could do both [The Hobbit and Sherlock]. I couldn’t believe it.”
The answer to all this could be that where you have such a big cinematic experience, not so reliant on the actor to fill the stage people that hand out the awards simply fail to notice the tremendous individual performances going in to it. It is looking very much that, as Sir Ian says, artistic integrity are the watchwords for the Hobbit trilogy.
Sir Ian McKellen has, himself a history of filling the stage, notably in Shakesperian drama and his exploits in The Rings trilogy certainly resonate. He is Gandalf in my mind. Maybe, just maybe this time, someone will get the recognition they deserve.

PHOTOS!!!







EEEEEEP!
XOXO, Hannah

Hobbit in 3 Parts: Titles & Release Dates


Ttrilogy adaptation of The Hobbit, by J.R.R. Tolkien, now titled “The Hobbit: There and Back Again,” will be released worldwide on July 18, 2014.

The title of the second installment in the franchise will be “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug,” and the fill will be released on December 13, 2013. The first film in the trilogy, “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” opens this holiday season, on December 14, 2012. Shot in 3D 48 frames-per-second, the trilogy of films will be released in High Frame Rate (HFR) 3D, other 3D formats, IMAX and 2D.
From Academy Award®-winning director Peter Jackson, the trilogy of films is set in Middle-earth 60 years before “The Lord of the Rings,” which Jackson and his filmmaking team brought to the big screen in the blockbuster trilogy that culminated with the Oscar®-winning “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.”
Under Jackson’s direction, all three movies are being shot in digital 3D using the latest camera and stereo technology. Additional filming, as with principal photography, is taking placice at Stone Street Studios, Wellington, and on location around New Zealand.
--

Hobbit Production Video #9



It's the ins and out of getting ready for the film. Last minute animations and so forth. Enjoy!
XOXO,
Hannah

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

THE HOBBIT AT THE COMICON

Here is a really interesting article about how different people felt about The hobbit being shot at 48 frames per second instead of the normal 24 fps. Quite interesting. 

Check it out: http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/peter-jacksons-48fps-presentation-of-the-hobbit-at-cinemacon-gets-a-mixed-response-20120424#


Luv,
Hannah

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

My Dad is Prepared to Offer a Deal

So I was talking to my dad about him coming with us to the Midnight Premiere. He would rather go at like 10 the next morning or something like that.

So he said he'd take ALL OF US out to breakfast before the movie if we go in the morning after the midnight premiere.

Not sure I still wanna go with that but just throwing it out there for discussion.

~Hannah

Monday, February 20, 2012

Peter Jackson Doubles Hobbit Filming Speed--(YESS!)

TAKEN FROM the-hobbit-movie.com
Peter Jackson is making his hobbits and dwarves march double-time in his “The Lord of the Rings” prequel, which he’s shooting in a faster film speed than the Hollywood standard.
Jackson hopes the 48-frames-a-second rate — twice the 24 frames that has been the custom since the 1920s — will help bring about a gradual transition to faster speeds that can bring more life-like images and action to the screen.
Digital cameras allow for shooting at 48 frames or faster, reducing the blurry effect known as strobing that can come with 24-frame filming.
Jackson said he hopes there will be a fair number of theaters equipped with digital projectors that can handle the faster film speeds by December, when Warner Bros. will release “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” the first chapter in his two-part adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy classic.
“You shoot at 48, project at 48 and you get an illusion of life that’s remarkable. You don’t realize just how strobing and how flickery 24 frames is,” Jackson said at the Sundance Film Festival, where he presented the documentary “West of Memphis,” produced by him and his wife, “Hobbit” co-writer Fran Walsh. “You look at something at 48 frames, and it looks gorgeous. It looks like real life. It’s amazing.”
Other digital pioneers are making the same push for higher film speeds. “Avatar” creator James Cameron has said he will shoot the sequel to his science-fiction blockbuster at 48 or 60 frames a second.
At the CinemaCon convention for theater owners in Las Vegas last March, Cameron showed footage he shot at 24, 48 and 60 frames a second. The faster speeds noticeably reduced or eliminated blurriness in action sequences or when the camera panned and dollied down the length of a crowded banquet table.
As Hollywood moved into the digital age, movie makers generally have stuck with the 24-frame speed at which celluloid film moves through cameras and projectors. “The Hobbit” will show that it’s an outdated way to shoot films, Jackson said.
“I’m hoping it’ll be just the first gentle step into changing film rates because we can change them, especially with all the digital technology now,” Jackson said. “Twenty-four is irrelevant. It doesn’t mean anything anymore. It’s just a traditional thing. It’s far from the best visual way to present a film.”
“The Hobbit” has had a hard road to the screen after Jackson’s blockbuster “Lord of the Rings” trilogy,” whose 2003 finale, “The Return of the King,” swept the Academy Awards with 11 trophies, including best picture and director.
Jackson planned only to co-write and co-produce “The Hobbit,” but he stepped in to direct after Guillermo del Toro dropped out because of delays caused by the bankruptcy of MGM, which owned half of the project.
“It’s actually been a reasonably joyous thing to do,” said Walsh, who returned as a co-writer and co-producer. “I’m surprised to say that because I thought it would be very hard. Certainly, it was a difficult birth of this film. It was protracted and fought. … But it’s surprisingly pleasant, if I can use that word. Pleasant. So far. So I hope I haven’t jinxed it.”
The two films are being shot simultaneously in 3-D, with the second one, “The Hobbit: There and Back Again,” due in theaters in December 2013.
British actor Martin Freeman stars as Bilbo Baggins, the hobbit who acquires the evil ring that sets the action of “The Lord of the Rings” in motion. Cast members returning from that trilogy include Ian McKellen, Elijah Wood, Cate Blanchett, Orlando Bloom, Ian Holm, Christopher Lee, Hugo Weaving and Andy Serkis.
Jackson joked that the snowy mountains surrounding Sundance’s home in the ski resort of Park City remind him of the heavy workload still ahead on “The Hobbit.”
“We have a hundred days of shooting to go, which still feels like we’re at the bottom of a mountain. I kind of don’t like being in Park City because I look up the mountain, and I kind of think, well, ‘The Hobbit’s’ at the top of that mountain. I’ve got to kind of climb this. It looks pretty daunting,” Jackson said.
Yet Jackson said he’s having a great time revisiting Tolkien’s Middle-earth.
“If I show up at work every day happy to be there and excited about what we’re shooting, to me, that’s always a good sign,” he said. “So I think we’re making a couple of pretty entertaining movies.”

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Cast List

The Cast So Far

Azog - Conan Stevens
Alfrid - Ryan Gage
Bard - Luke Evans
Balin - Ken Stott
Beorn - Mikael Persbrandt
Bifur - William Kircher
Bilbo Baggins - Martin Freeman
Bofur - James Nesbitt
Bombur - Steven Hunter
Dain Ironfoot - Billy Connolly
Dori - Mark Hadlow
Drogo Baggins - Ryan Cage
Dwalin - Graham McTavish
Elrond - Hugo Weaving
Fili - Dean O’Gorman
Frodo Baggins - Elijah Wood
Galadriel - Cate Blanchett
Gandalf - Sir Ian McKellen
Gloin - Peter Hambleton
Goblin King - Barry Humphries
Gollum - Andy Serkis
Kili - Aidan Turner
Legolas - Orlando Bloom
Lindir - Bret McKenzie
Lord Balin - Ken Stott
Master of Laketown - Stephen Fry
Necromancer - Benedict Cumberbatch
Nori - Jed Brophy
Oin - John Callen
Ori - Adam Brown
Radagast -Sylvester McCoy
Saruman - Sir Cristopher Lee
Smaug - Benedict Cumberbatch
Tauriel - Evangeline Lilly
Thorin - Richard Armitage
Thrain - Mike Mizrahi (TBC)
Thranduil - Lee Pace
Thror - Jeffrey Thomas (TBC)

LOTR Jokes and Laughs

I promised to send some humor. :D Here you go!!

LOTR HUMOR

They have both written and images.

HOBBIT TRAILER!!!



I am SO seeing this on opening night.

Bilbo looks like he'll be good! Thorin too. The actor for Thorin also played--wait for it--Mr. Thornton in BBC's North and South!! MAJOR SWOON.

Anyway, hope you enjoy!

Hobbit Production Videos

Production Video #1

Production Video #2

Production Video #3

Production Video #4

Production Video #5

What For

Sooo welcome to the FOCUS Hobbit Hole.

Post when you find stuff about the hobbit or anything geeky LOTR related. I'll make this blog look way cooler. No worries. :D